Do not display the title of unsubscribed issues or pull requests in the notification web page . The title of some random issues or pull requests from repositories were accidentally displayed in the notifications of a user. It was a rare occurrence, caused by an incorrect comparison of two unrelated unique identifiers that are unlikely to match (the id of the notification and the id of a repository). If the issue or the pull request belonged to a private repository to which the user had no read access, only the title was leaked. The user was denied permission to view the issue or the pull request when clicking on the link displayed in the notifications web page.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [x] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9362): <!--number 9362 --><!--line 0 --><!--description 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-->Do not display the title of unsubscribed issues or pull requests in the notification web page . The title of some random issues or pull requests from repositories were accidentally displayed in the notifications of a user. It was a rare occurrence, caused by an incorrect comparison of two unrelated unique identifiers that are unlikely to match (the id of the notification and the id of a repository). If the issue or the pull request belonged to a private repository to which the user had no read access, only the title was leaked. The user was denied permission to view the issue or the pull request when clicking on the link displayed in the notifications web page.<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9362
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Prepares for the addition of foreign keys to Forgejo tables by bringing xorm over to https://code.forgejo.org/xorm/xorm/releases/tag/v1.3.9-forgejo.1.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [ ] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9326
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
TL;DR we can test if transactions are actually working.
Forgejo has many helper functions to test various aspects of the database state, however one aspect it is not able to test is transactions. As this would require that some random SQL query fails to indeed observe that the whole transaction is being rollbacked.
So how do we make a random SQL query fail? Via a fault injector hook, which is always added to xorm (during unittest) and can be enabled on demand to say after how many SQL queries it should start returning a error (fault injecting).
This allows a test to do the following: after two SQL queries lets call it a day and then execute the function that starts a transaction and does a few SQL query. It can then observe that indeed the function was fault injected (`ErrFaultInjected` is returned) and after querying the database it can observe that nothing was changed and thus can conclude the transaction was rollbacked.
---
To demonstrate how the fault injector test helper can be used, lets add a test to a function I really wanted to test but couldn't because the fault injector didn't exist. `NewTwoFactor` was recently made into a transaction (a8c61532d2) and although it would not be catastrophic it would be really bad if records were being inserted if for some reason setting the secret failed.
The test that's added demonstrates that the function uses a transaction and rollbacks correctly.
Weirdly enough the fault injector can be viewed as testing a specification, because it assumes nothing about how the function does it (and you could even design a function that purposely doesn't work but succeeds this test), it merely assumes there's a transaction and within that transaction some SQL queries will be done. However it also needs a certain amount of knowledge about how the function is implemented because the developer needs to tell after how many SQL queries you want to inject a fault and you want to do at a point where there's already a observable change happening in the transaction and not fault inject if the transaction only contains `SELECT` queries.
I'm sure you could design a smart fault injector that can do such guess work (although it sounds like a topic for a PhD thesis) and you could design a helper function that can then guide the fault injector to find every interesting place to do a fault injection and ensure the transaction always falls back; as a first prototype having the programmer tell after how many SQL queries a fault should be injected is sufficient for a lot of the transaction we are going to test in Forgejo.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9314
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Adds new a function, `AcceptsGithubResponse`, to the API router context struct to check if the requests accepts a Github response. Although Forgejo API will never be compatible with the Github API, historically Forgejo's API has been designed to follow that of Github closely and we know that a lot of tooling that uses the Github API can be used against the Forgejo API with little to no problem.
As a meet in the middle solution, this function can be used to respond with a more appropriate response that follows the Github API. This allows Forgejo to avoid breaking compatibility with existing users of the API and allows the API to be oh so slightly more compatible with that of Github for API clients that expect a Github response.
Because the `upload_url` field was added purely to match the Github API (forgejo/forgejo#580), it is fair to actually make it compatible with how the Github API intended it to be and that is by adding `{?name,label}` which is used by Github's Oktokit.
Only add `{?name,label}` when Forgejo knows the request accepts a Github response. This avoids breaking the API compatibility with non-Github API clients.
ResolvesCodeberg/Community#2132
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9285
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Discovered a regression caused by #9017.
Steps to reproduce:
- Disable the forgejo-runner that will pick up a workflow
- Trigger any workflow to run
- Through the Actions list, click on the new workflow that is pending a runner to fetch it
- You'll be redirected to /user/repo/actions/runs/73/jobs/0/attempt/0 (attempt = 0)
- The UI will appear normal with the job "Waiting"...
- Startup the forgejo-runner to pick up the workflow
- The UI will begin to have errors:
- JavaScript promise rejection: JSON.parse: unexpected keyword at line 1 column 1 of the JSON data. Open browser console to see more details. (5)
The cause is that the redirect to `/attempt/0` occurs for a job that hasn't been started, but once the job is started attempt 0 is not a valid attempt and errors will occur when polling for data. This fix corrects the problem by redirecting to the attempt that will be present (attempt 1) when the job is fetched.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9293
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
- Because we wish to show the status of the old and new commit of a force push, ignore that the commit doesn't exist and return a commit with only its ID filled. This is enough to still show the CI status of this commit although the commit itself is no longer reachable.
- Add unit test.
- Add integration test.
- Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#9250
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9262
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
This PR contains the following updates:
| Package | Change | Age | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/v9 | `v9.1.1` -> `v11.0.0` | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) | [](https://docs.renovatebot.com/merge-confidence/) |
---
### Configuration
📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC), Automerge - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM ( * 0-3 * * * ) (UTC).
🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
---
- [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box
---
This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
<!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiI0MS43Ni4wIiwidXBkYXRlZEluVmVyIjoiNDEuNzYuMCIsInRhcmdldEJyYW5jaCI6ImZvcmdlam8iLCJsYWJlbHMiOlsiZGVwZW5kZW5jeS11cGdyYWRlIiwidGVzdC9ub3QtbmVlZGVkIl19-->
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9218
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
Co-committed-by: Renovate Bot <forgejo-renovate-action@forgejo.org>
This patch is mainly intended to fixforgejo/forgejo#7721, and to fixforgejo/forgejo#9019.
It also changes the evaluation of 0 limits to prevent all writes, instead of allowing one write and then failing on subsequent writes after the limit has been exceeded. This matches the expectation of the existing tests, and I believe it will better match the expectations of users.
Tests have been updated accordingly where necessary, and some additional test coverage added.
The fixes in this PR depend on each other in order for the quota system to function correctly, so I'm submitting them as a single PR instead of individually.
## Test Cases
### Quota subjects not covered by their parent subjects
Before enabling quotas, create a test user and test repository for that user.
Enable quotas, and set a default total to some large value. (Do not use unit suffixes forgejo/forgejo#8996)
```ini
[quota]
ENABLED = true
[quota.default]
TOTAL = 1073741824
```
With the test user, navigate to "Storage overview" and verify that the quota group "Global quota" is the only group listed, containing the rule "Default", and displays the configured limit, and that the limit has not been exceeded (eg. `42 MiB / 1 GiB`).
The default quota rule has the subject `size:all`, so any write action should be allowed.
#### Attempt to create a new repository.
Expected result: Repository is created.
Actual result: Error 413, You have exhausted your quota.
#### Attempt to create a new file in the existing repository.
Expected result: File is created.
Actual result: Error 413, You have exhausted your quota.
#### Create an issue on the test repository, and attempt to upload an image to the issue.
Expected result: Image is uploaded.
Actual Result: Quota exceeded. Displays error message: `JavaScript promise rejection: can't access property "submitted", oi[ji.uuid] is undefined. Open browser console to see more details.`
### Unlimited quota rules incorrectly allow all writes
With quotas enabled, [Use the API](https://forgejo.org/docs/latest/admin/advanced/quota/#advanced-usage-via-api) to create a quota group containing a single rule with a subject of `sizelfs`, and a limit of `-1` (Unlimited). Add the test user to this group.
```json
{
"name": "git-lfs-unlimited",
"rules": [
{
"name": "git-lfs-unlimited",
"limit": -1,
"subjects": ["sizelfs"]
}
]
}
```
With the test user, navigate to "Storage overview" and verify that the user has been added to this group, that it is the only group the user is assigned to, and that the rule limit displays as "Unlimited".
The user should only have the ability to write to Git LFS storage, all other writes should be denied.
#### Attempt to create a new repository.
Expected result: Error 413, You have exhausted your quota.
Actual result: Repository is created.
#### Attempt to create a new file in the test repository.
Expected result: Error 413, You have exhausted your quota.
Actual result: File is created.
#### Create an issue on the test repository, and attempt to upload an image to the issue.
Expected Result: Quota exceeded.
Actual result: Image is uploaded.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9033
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Brook Miles <brook@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: Brook Miles <brook@noreply.codeberg.org>
In #9017, the ability to view older logs of an action run was added. However, the 'Re-run all jobs' button was not updated in any way. When viewing the logs for attempt 1 and clicking 'Re-run all jobs', the UI would continue to show the logs for attempt 1. Before #9017 the behavior would have begun to view the logs from the re-run operation.
There are two commits in this PR:
- Update the `Rerun` view handler so that it redirects the user to the next attempt number for the job.
- The next attempt number isn't actually persisted to the DB until the rerun is picked up from a worker. By pure coincidence, viewing an out-of-range attempt number was fully functional because it also happened to be viewing a job that wasn't picked up by a worker, and fell into those code paths. However, as there were no automated tests around this codepath and it felt fragile, new tests have been added around the template render, backend data fetch, and frontend UI component, to ensure it continues to work in this corner-case in the future.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [x] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. (_Note_: This is a fix for an unreleased regression, no need for release notes.)
- [ ] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9172
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Adds a new dropdown to the job logs, visible only when a job has been retried at least once:
When an older run attempt from the dropdown is selected, displays the older run's logs:
Context on implementation & design decisions:
- It is important that when a URL from an Action's log is shared, the person on the other side sees the exact same logs that were being viewed. For this reason, all log views are automatically redirected to a fully-qualified URL (including the *run*, *job*, and *attempt*), so that when they are shared there is a guarantee of stability in the viewed logs.
- Individual jobs can be rerun any number of times independent of other jobs in the same workflow. This means there isn't a "set" of related jobs that were executed at the same time, and this led me to remove the display of current status of jobs on the left-hand side of the view. There isn't a logical set of job statuses to display here.
Fixes#1043. Based upon @gmem's original work in #1416.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [x] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- User Interface features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9017): <!--number 9017 --><!--line 0 --><!--description YWJpbGl0eSB0byB2aWV3IHByZXZpb3VzIGxvZ3MgZm9yIEFjdGlvbnMgcnVucyB0aGF0IGhhdmUgYmVlbiByZXRyaWVk-->ability to view previous logs for Actions runs that have been retried<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9017
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Related to https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/1944
* Allowed the githubdownloaderv3 to know whether issues and, or PRs are requested to migrate
* Used this information to decide to filter for "/pulls/" or "/issues"
* Or not to filter at all if issues == true && prs == true
* Added isolated test for the downloader and for the uploader
* Created a new test_repo in github.com/forgejo and set it up properly together with @Gusted
* Updated github_downloader_test with the new URLs and test data from the repo
* Recorded the API calls for local testing
* Added a minimal gitbucket test (which uses the github downloader under the hood)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8892
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: patdyn <patdyn@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: patdyn <patdyn@noreply.codeberg.org>
Do not allow credentials to be present in the URLs that are provided for
migrations and push mirrors. They have to be given via the dedicated
input fields. Give a error when this happens.
There's nothing wrong with trying have the backend "correct" this, but
would be a larger patch than necessary in the context of a security fix.
This can be done in public.
Print out a list of all unused msgids
Handle Go files that make calls to translation.
Handle `models/unit/unit.go`, which stores msgids in `$Unit.NameKey`
Handle .locale.Tr in templates
Handle simple dynamically constructed `Tr("msgid-prefix." + SomeFunctionCall())`.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8736
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Ellen Εμιλία Άννα Zscheile <fogti+devel@ytrizja.de>
Co-committed-by: Ellen Εμιλία Άννα Zscheile <fogti+devel@ytrizja.de>
- the run ID used to download artifacts is absolute (ID) instead of being
relative to the repository (Index) for compatibility with the url built
and returned as `artifact-url` by the the upload-artifact@v4 action.
- this is a breaking change because URLs to download artifacts
previous saved/bookmarked and not yet expired expired are no
longer working, they need to be looked up again by visiting the job
web page.
- add unit tests for getRunByID().
- RepoActionView.test.js verifies the download URL is built using the
run ID.
- lAdd integration tests to verify the RunID is set as expected in
the template used by RepoActionView.vue.
Refs https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/issues/187
The web endpoint
`/{owner}/{repo}/actions/runs/{run_id}/artifacts/{artifact_name_or_id}`
can be used with either the artifact name used when it is uploaded or the instance wide unique number of the artifact, if it is not found. For instance:
`/root/myrepo/actions/run/3/artifacts/my_artifact_name`
or
`/root/myrepo/actions/run/3/artifacts/42`
The `upload-artifact@v4` output value `artifact-url` is built in this way and is now a valid URL to access the artifact.
Refs https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/6147
Refs https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/issues/187
Refs https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/upload-artifact/src/tag/v4#outputs
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8957): <!--number 8957 --><!--line 0 --><!--description YXJ0aWZhY3RzIGNhbiBiZSBkb3dubG9hZGVkIHVzaW5nIHRoZWlyIGlkIGluc3RlYWQgb2YgdGhlaXIgbmFtZQ==-->artifacts can be downloaded using their id instead of their name<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8957
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mfenniak@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
- gopkg.in/yaml.v3 is archived and unmaintained
- go.yaml.in/yaml/v3 is a compatible fork under the umbrella
of https://yaml.org/
### Tests
There is no need for more tests than already provided: it is like an upgrade to a minor version, only from a fork. I browsed the changes and there are some bug fixes. They all seem reasonably minimal. It is not one of those forks that went crazy with breaking changes 😁 And there is a non zero chance that [a bug that matters to Forgejo Actions](https://github.com/yaml/go-yaml/issues/76) is fixed there. It is rare and can wait but it did happen on Codeberg.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8956
Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
The following errors are specific to the scheduled workflow being handled. They do not imply the remaining scheduled workflows cannot be scheduled successfully.
- Failure to create a scheduled task which is most likely caused by an invalid YAML file.
- Failure to parse the scheduling specs which can be caused by a number of formating errors.
Instead of returning on error, the corrupted workflow is disabled.
Also display more informative error messages so that the failed workflow can be identified from the logged error.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8942): <!--number 8942 --><!--line 0 --><!--description YSBjb3JydXB0ZWQgRm9yZ2VqbyBBY3Rpb25zIHNjaGVkdWxlZCB3b3JrZmxvdyBpcyBkaXNhYmxlZA==-->a corrupted Forgejo Actions scheduled workflow is disabled<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8942
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
This is an alternate take on https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8808 which allows Actions tokens to access other repos which are readable by by signed in users. In practise this means public repos belonging to public or limited owners.
This PR is split into two commits to aid review of the security-sensitive changes I've made:
* The first commit is a refactor _which is not intended to change behaviour_. It extracts the permission logic for Actions tokens from the githttp handler and moves it to `repo_permission.go` alongside the permission logic for regular users. The new function, `GetActionRepoPermission` returns a `Permission` object just like `GetUserRepoPermission`. Only code unit access is currently allowed in the interest of keeping this commit from changing any access logic.
* The second commit is the broadening of access: this commit changes the logic in `GetActionRepoPermission` to give actions tokens access to repos readable by signed in users.
cc @earl-warren
ref https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/5877
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8889): <!--number 8889 --><!--line 0 --><!--description YWxsb3cgQWN0aW9ucyB0b2tlbnMgdG8gYWNjZXNzIHJlcG9zIHJlYWRhYmxlIGJ5IHNpZ25lZCBpbiB1c2Vycw==-->allow Actions tokens to access repos readable by signed in users<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8889
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Hailey Somerville <hailey@hails.org>
Co-committed-by: Hailey Somerville <hailey@hails.org>
resolves#8549
This PR add a config to enforce 2FA for the whole Forgejo instance. It can be configured to `none`, `admin` or `all`.
A user who is required to enable 2FA is like a disabled user. He can only see the `/user/settings/security`-Page to enable 2FA, this should be similar to a user which needs to change his password. Also api and git-commands are not allowed.
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [ ] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
I will do it, if the general idea of this PR is a good feature.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Security features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8753): <!--number 8753 --><!--line 0 --><!--description R2xvYmFsIDJGQSBlbmZvcmNlbWVudA==-->Global 2FA enforcement<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8753
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Ellen Εμιλία Άννα Zscheile <fogti@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: zokki <zokki.softwareschmiede@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: zokki <zokki.softwareschmiede@gmail.com>
If a change is part of a force-push and the commit(s) have a CI status, this will now be shown after the hashes.
`interactiveBorder` has been lowered as it was possible to activate the hover state for both commits. It would be unreasonable to test this within Playwright and thus this needs to be manually tested. On a pull request page that contains a force-push you will notice:
a) the (de)activation area for force-pushes is now smaller, and;
b) it is not possible to activate the hover state/popup for both commits.
ExecuteTemplate function from @gusted
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/5168https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2884Close#4932
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8655
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Squel <squeljur+git@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Squel <squeljur+git@gmail.com>
Prevents a variety of user-entered texts that can contain `|` characters from being truncated in the activity feed, affecting: issue & PR titles, comment content, review comments, and review dismissal comments.
Where `action.content` was containing a pipe-separated list of UI data fields before, it now uses a JSON-encoded string array. The old format is still supported for reading from the feed. In some places where `action.content` was not using this format, or where user-generated text was not inserted, the old format is retained.
Fixes part of the cause behind #8781, allowing small mermaid graphs to be rendered in the feed (for now...) --
## Checklist
The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org).
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8844
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Should fix failures like: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/actions/runs/94872/jobs/9
### Documentation
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [x] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8847
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
MariaDB supports "INSERT ... RETURNING ..." since 10.5.0, so this patch makes `mysqlGetNextResourceIndex` use that, provided the query is run on MariaDB of a sufficient version. If it's not supported it proceeds as it always did.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8691
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: BtbN <btbn@btbn.de>
Co-committed-by: BtbN <btbn@btbn.de>
Add a new config option for OAuth2 authentication sources: allow users to change their username.
In the case where OAuth2 is more like a social OAuth2 login there's no need to not allow users to change their username. The information how the user is linked to the authentication source is stored in different fields.
Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#687
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8714
Reviewed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Mainly a port of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31082.
closes#3573
## Screenshots
---
## Checklist
### Tests
- I added test coverage for Go changes...
- [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests.
- [ ] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server.
- I added test coverage for JavaScript changes...
- [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested.
- [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)).
### Documentation
- [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change.
- [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it.
### Release notes
- [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes.
- [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request.
- [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- User Interface features
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8759): <!--number 8759 --><!--line 0 --><!--description YWRkIHRhZyBsYWJlbCB0byBjb21taXQgbGlzdCB2aWV3-->add tag label to commit list view<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8759
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: pat-s <patrick.schratz@gmail.com>
Speaking from personal experience, when exploring the API I find myself trying to parse the exact meaning of many descriptions for a while, and I also have to get used to many different kinds of inconsistencies and grammar issues.
This PR improves a few of these. Some I tried to reword to make them easier to understand, for others I just improved consistency a little, like capitalization. This area needs more work, this PR just makes some progress. Anything that is improved in this one can be improved further in later PRs, so in review please focus on regressions if you find any.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8728
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: 0ko <0ko@noreply.codeberg.org>
- Use the keying module, that was introduced in forgejo/forgejo#5041, to store action secrets safely and securely in the database.
- Introduce a central function that sets the secret, `SetSecret` and let the caller do the update call. This is similar to how the twofactor (TOTP) models does it. Ref. https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/6074
- Add a relaxed migration, that is run inside a transaction. If it cannot decrypt a action secret, then it's deleted.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8692
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
This reverts commit e271c24100.
It was an experiment to verify that adding a delay to the test make a difference. But it does not so... reverting.
@jerger before engaging in a refactor, it is necessary to get to the bottom of this:
- Find the root cause of those failures
- Fix it in a minimal way
Refs https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8274#issuecomment-5987215
---
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/actions/runs/92182/jobs/9
- https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/actions/runs/92182/jobs/10
```
--- FAIL: TestFederationHttpSigValidation (11.34s)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/07/28 00:23:46 ...les/storage/local.go:33:NewLocalStorage() [I] Creating new Local Storage at /workspace/forgejo/forgejo/tests/gitea-lfs-meta
testlogger.go:411: 2025/07/28 00:23:52 ...ypub/reqsignature.go:76:func1() [W] verifyHttpSignatures failed: neither "Signature" nor "Authorization" have signature parameters
testlogger.go:411: 2025/07/28 00:23:52 ...eb/routing/logger.go:102:func1() [I] router: completed GET http://127.0.0.1:3002/api/v1/activitypub/user-id/2 for test-mock:12345, 400 Bad Request in 5.3ms @ activitypub/reqsignature.go:74(activitypub.ReqHTTPUserOrInstanceSignature)
testlogger.go:411: 2025/07/28 00:23:52 ...ces/auth/httpsign.go:70:Verify() [W] Failed authentication attempt from 127.0.0.1:43244
testlogger.go:411: 2025/07/28 00:23:55 ...eb/routing/logger.go:68:func1() [W] router: slow GET /api/v1/activitypub/user-id/2 for 127.0.0.1:43244, elapsed 3684.7ms @ activitypub/reqsignature.go:74(activitypub.ReqHTTPUserOrInstanceSignature)
--- FAIL: TestFederationHttpSigValidation/SignedRequest (5.01s)
api_federation_httpsig_test.go:50:
Error Trace: /workspace/forgejo/forgejo/tests/integration/api_federation_httpsig_test.go:50
Error: Received unexpected error:
Get "http://127.0.0.1:3002/api/v1/activitypub/user-id/2": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
Test: TestFederationHttpSigValidation/SignedRequest
--- FAIL: TestFederationHttpSigValidation/ValidateCaches (0.00s)
api_federation_httpsig_test.go:64:
Error Trace: /workspace/forgejo/forgejo/tests/integration/api_federation_httpsig_test.go:64
Error: Expected value not to be nil.
Test: TestFederationHttpSigValidation/ValidateCaches
test_utils.go:247: PrepareTestEnv:Process "GET: /api/v1/activitypub/user-id/2" cancelled
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered]
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x0 pc=0x4cc464a]
```
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8705
Reviewed-by: jerger <jerger@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
- Add the written HTTP status after completing the HTTP response. This makes it easier to find that one request that returns a different status code (ref. https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2049#issue-1972600)
- Add the affected amount of rows and last insert ID after the SQL query is done, I have not yet a concrete use-case but this might help with debugging which ID corresponds to some SQL query that someone might want to take a closer look at and if some SQL query affects more than necessary amount of rows.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8680
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
- Add links to review request targets in issue comments
- Fix links to ghost users/orgs/teams to be empty
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8239
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
Co-committed-by: Robert Wolff <mahlzahn@posteo.de>
- Implementation of milestone 5. from **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting** (part of [amendment of the workplan](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/sustainability/src/branch/main/2022-12-01-nlnet/2025-02-07-extended-workplan.md#task-f-moderation-features-reporting) for NLnet 2022-12-035):
`5. Forgejo admins can see a list of reports`
There is a lot of room for improvements, but it was decided to start with a basic version so that feedback can be collected from real-life usages (based on which the UI might change a lot).
- Also covers milestone 2. from same **Task F. Moderation features: Reporting**:
`2. Reports from multiple users are combined in the database and don't create additional reports.`
But instead of combining the reports when stored, they are grouped when retrieved (it was concluded _that it might be preferable to take care of the deduplication while implementing the admin interface_; see https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7939#issuecomment-4841754 for more details).
---
Follow-up of !6977
### See also:
- forgejo/design#30
---
This adds a new _Moderation reports_ section (/admin/moderation/reports) within the _Site administration_ page, where administrators can see an overview with the submitted abuse reports that are still open (not yet handled in any way). When multiple reports exist for the same content (submitted by distinct users) only the first one will be shown in the list and a counter can be seen on the right side (indicating the number of open reports for the same content type and ID). Clicking on the counter or the icon from the right side will open the details page where a list with all the reports (when multiple) linked to the reported content is available, as well as any shadow copy saved for the current report(s).
The new section is available only when moderation in enabled ([moderation] ENABLED config is set as true within app.ini).
Discussions regarding the UI/UX started with https://codeberg.org/forgejo/design/issues/30#issuecomment-2908849
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7905
Reviewed-by: Otto <otto@codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: jerger <jerger@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
Co-committed-by: floss4good <floss4good@disroot.org>
This reverts commit 7380eac5a2.
Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8612
It is possible for the action feed to reference deleted repositories the
`INNER JOIN` will make sure that these are filtered out. We cannot
filter these out after the fact, because the value of `count` will still
be incorrect.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8617
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
