1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2025-09-30 19:22:08 +00:00
forgejo/models/perm/access/repo_permission.go

479 lines
14 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2018 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package access
import (
"context"
"fmt"
fix: allow Actions tokens to access repos readable by signed in users (#8889) This is an alternate take on https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8808 which allows Actions tokens to access other repos which are readable by by signed in users. In practise this means public repos belonging to public or limited owners. This PR is split into two commits to aid review of the security-sensitive changes I've made: * The first commit is a refactor _which is not intended to change behaviour_. It extracts the permission logic for Actions tokens from the githttp handler and moves it to `repo_permission.go` alongside the permission logic for regular users. The new function, `GetActionRepoPermission` returns a `Permission` object just like `GetUserRepoPermission`. Only code unit access is currently allowed in the interest of keeping this commit from changing any access logic. * The second commit is the broadening of access: this commit changes the logic in `GetActionRepoPermission` to give actions tokens access to repos readable by signed in users. cc @earl-warren ref https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/5877 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Bug fixes - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8889): <!--number 8889 --><!--line 0 --><!--description YWxsb3cgQWN0aW9ucyB0b2tlbnMgdG8gYWNjZXNzIHJlcG9zIHJlYWRhYmxlIGJ5IHNpZ25lZCBpbiB1c2Vycw==-->allow Actions tokens to access repos readable by signed in users<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8889 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Hailey Somerville <hailey@hails.org> Co-committed-by: Hailey Somerville <hailey@hails.org>
2025-08-18 14:40:07 +02:00
actions_model "forgejo.org/models/actions"
"forgejo.org/models/db"
"forgejo.org/models/organization"
perm_model "forgejo.org/models/perm"
repo_model "forgejo.org/models/repo"
"forgejo.org/models/unit"
user_model "forgejo.org/models/user"
"forgejo.org/modules/log"
)
// Permission contains all the permissions related variables to a repository for a user
type Permission struct {
AccessMode perm_model.AccessMode
Units []*repo_model.RepoUnit
UnitsMode map[unit.Type]perm_model.AccessMode
}
// IsOwner returns true if current user is the owner of repository.
func (p *Permission) IsOwner() bool {
return p.AccessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeOwner
}
// IsAdmin returns true if current user has admin or higher access of repository.
func (p *Permission) IsAdmin() bool {
return p.AccessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeAdmin
}
// IsGloballyWriteable returns true if the unit is writeable by all users of the instance.
func (p *Permission) IsGloballyWriteable(unitType unit.Type) bool {
for _, u := range p.Units {
if u.Type == unitType {
return u.DefaultPermissions == repo_model.UnitAccessModeWrite
}
}
return false
}
// HasAccess returns true if the current user has at least read access to any unit of this repository
func (p *Permission) HasAccess() bool {
if p.UnitsMode == nil {
return p.AccessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeRead
}
return len(p.UnitsMode) > 0
}
// UnitAccessMode returns current user accessmode to the specify unit of the repository
func (p *Permission) UnitAccessMode(unitType unit.Type) perm_model.AccessMode {
if p.UnitsMode == nil {
for _, u := range p.Units {
if u.Type == unitType {
return p.AccessMode
}
}
return perm_model.AccessModeNone
}
return p.UnitsMode[unitType]
}
// CanAccess returns true if user has mode access to the unit of the repository
func (p *Permission) CanAccess(mode perm_model.AccessMode, unitType unit.Type) bool {
return p.UnitAccessMode(unitType) >= mode
}
// CanAccessAny returns true if user has mode access to any of the units of the repository
func (p *Permission) CanAccessAny(mode perm_model.AccessMode, unitTypes ...unit.Type) bool {
for _, u := range unitTypes {
if p.CanAccess(mode, u) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
// CanRead returns true if user could read to this unit
func (p *Permission) CanRead(unitType unit.Type) bool {
return p.CanAccess(perm_model.AccessModeRead, unitType)
}
// CanReadAny returns true if user has read access to any of the units of the repository
func (p *Permission) CanReadAny(unitTypes ...unit.Type) bool {
return p.CanAccessAny(perm_model.AccessModeRead, unitTypes...)
}
// CanReadIssuesOrPulls returns true if isPull is true and user could read pull requests and
// returns true if isPull is false and user could read to issues
func (p *Permission) CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull bool) bool {
if isPull {
return p.CanRead(unit.TypePullRequests)
}
return p.CanRead(unit.TypeIssues)
}
// CanWrite returns true if user could write to this unit
func (p *Permission) CanWrite(unitType unit.Type) bool {
return p.CanAccess(perm_model.AccessModeWrite, unitType)
}
// CanWriteIssuesOrPulls returns true if isPull is true and user could write to pull requests and
// returns true if isPull is false and user could write to issues
func (p *Permission) CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(isPull bool) bool {
if isPull {
return p.CanWrite(unit.TypePullRequests)
}
return p.CanWrite(unit.TypeIssues)
}
Rewrite logger system (#24726) ## ⚠️ Breaking The `log.<mode>.<logger>` style config has been dropped. If you used it, please check the new config manual & app.example.ini to make your instance output logs as expected. Although many legacy options still work, it's encouraged to upgrade to the new options. The SMTP logger is deleted because SMTP is not suitable to collect logs. If you have manually configured Gitea log options, please confirm the logger system works as expected after upgrading. ## Description Close #12082 and maybe more log-related issues, resolve some related FIXMEs in old code (which seems unfixable before) Just like rewriting queue #24505 : make code maintainable, clear legacy bugs, and add the ability to support more writers (eg: JSON, structured log) There is a new document (with examples): `logging-config.en-us.md` This PR is safer than the queue rewriting, because it's just for logging, it won't break other logic. ## The old problems The logging system is quite old and difficult to maintain: * Unclear concepts: Logger, NamedLogger, MultiChannelledLogger, SubLogger, EventLogger, WriterLogger etc * Some code is diffuclt to konw whether it is right: `log.DelNamedLogger("console")` vs `log.DelNamedLogger(log.DEFAULT)` vs `log.DelLogger("console")` * The old system heavily depends on ini config system, it's difficult to create new logger for different purpose, and it's very fragile. * The "color" trick is difficult to use and read, many colors are unnecessary, and in the future structured log could help * It's difficult to add other log formats, eg: JSON format * The log outputer doesn't have full control of its goroutine, it's difficult to make outputer have advanced behaviors * The logs could be lost in some cases: eg: no Fatal error when using CLI. * Config options are passed by JSON, which is quite fragile. * INI package makes the KEY in `[log]` section visible in `[log.sub1]` and `[log.sub1.subA]`, this behavior is quite fragile and would cause more unclear problems, and there is no strong requirement to support `log.<mode>.<logger>` syntax. ## The new design See `logger.go` for documents. ## Screenshot <details> ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/4462d713-ba39-41f5-bb08-de912e67e1ff) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/b188035e-f691-428b-8b2d-ff7b2199b2f9) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/132e9745-1c3b-4e00-9e0d-15eaea495dee) </details> ## TODO * [x] add some new tests * [x] fix some tests * [x] test some sub-commands (manually ....) --------- Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-22 06:35:11 +08:00
func (p *Permission) LogString() string {
format := "<Permission AccessMode=%s, %d Units, %d UnitsMode(s): [ "
args := []any{p.AccessMode.String(), len(p.Units), len(p.UnitsMode)}
for i, unit := range p.Units {
config := ""
if unit.Config != nil {
configBytes, err := unit.Config.ToDB()
config = string(configBytes)
if err != nil {
config = err.Error()
}
}
Rewrite logger system (#24726) ## ⚠️ Breaking The `log.<mode>.<logger>` style config has been dropped. If you used it, please check the new config manual & app.example.ini to make your instance output logs as expected. Although many legacy options still work, it's encouraged to upgrade to the new options. The SMTP logger is deleted because SMTP is not suitable to collect logs. If you have manually configured Gitea log options, please confirm the logger system works as expected after upgrading. ## Description Close #12082 and maybe more log-related issues, resolve some related FIXMEs in old code (which seems unfixable before) Just like rewriting queue #24505 : make code maintainable, clear legacy bugs, and add the ability to support more writers (eg: JSON, structured log) There is a new document (with examples): `logging-config.en-us.md` This PR is safer than the queue rewriting, because it's just for logging, it won't break other logic. ## The old problems The logging system is quite old and difficult to maintain: * Unclear concepts: Logger, NamedLogger, MultiChannelledLogger, SubLogger, EventLogger, WriterLogger etc * Some code is diffuclt to konw whether it is right: `log.DelNamedLogger("console")` vs `log.DelNamedLogger(log.DEFAULT)` vs `log.DelLogger("console")` * The old system heavily depends on ini config system, it's difficult to create new logger for different purpose, and it's very fragile. * The "color" trick is difficult to use and read, many colors are unnecessary, and in the future structured log could help * It's difficult to add other log formats, eg: JSON format * The log outputer doesn't have full control of its goroutine, it's difficult to make outputer have advanced behaviors * The logs could be lost in some cases: eg: no Fatal error when using CLI. * Config options are passed by JSON, which is quite fragile. * INI package makes the KEY in `[log]` section visible in `[log.sub1]` and `[log.sub1.subA]`, this behavior is quite fragile and would cause more unclear problems, and there is no strong requirement to support `log.<mode>.<logger>` syntax. ## The new design See `logger.go` for documents. ## Screenshot <details> ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/4462d713-ba39-41f5-bb08-de912e67e1ff) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/b188035e-f691-428b-8b2d-ff7b2199b2f9) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/132e9745-1c3b-4e00-9e0d-15eaea495dee) </details> ## TODO * [x] add some new tests * [x] fix some tests * [x] test some sub-commands (manually ....) --------- Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-22 06:35:11 +08:00
format += "\nUnits[%d]: ID: %d RepoID: %d Type: %s Config: %s"
args = append(args, i, unit.ID, unit.RepoID, unit.Type.LogString(), config)
}
for key, value := range p.UnitsMode {
format += "\nUnitMode[%-v]: %-v"
args = append(args, key.LogString(), value.LogString())
}
Rewrite logger system (#24726) ## ⚠️ Breaking The `log.<mode>.<logger>` style config has been dropped. If you used it, please check the new config manual & app.example.ini to make your instance output logs as expected. Although many legacy options still work, it's encouraged to upgrade to the new options. The SMTP logger is deleted because SMTP is not suitable to collect logs. If you have manually configured Gitea log options, please confirm the logger system works as expected after upgrading. ## Description Close #12082 and maybe more log-related issues, resolve some related FIXMEs in old code (which seems unfixable before) Just like rewriting queue #24505 : make code maintainable, clear legacy bugs, and add the ability to support more writers (eg: JSON, structured log) There is a new document (with examples): `logging-config.en-us.md` This PR is safer than the queue rewriting, because it's just for logging, it won't break other logic. ## The old problems The logging system is quite old and difficult to maintain: * Unclear concepts: Logger, NamedLogger, MultiChannelledLogger, SubLogger, EventLogger, WriterLogger etc * Some code is diffuclt to konw whether it is right: `log.DelNamedLogger("console")` vs `log.DelNamedLogger(log.DEFAULT)` vs `log.DelLogger("console")` * The old system heavily depends on ini config system, it's difficult to create new logger for different purpose, and it's very fragile. * The "color" trick is difficult to use and read, many colors are unnecessary, and in the future structured log could help * It's difficult to add other log formats, eg: JSON format * The log outputer doesn't have full control of its goroutine, it's difficult to make outputer have advanced behaviors * The logs could be lost in some cases: eg: no Fatal error when using CLI. * Config options are passed by JSON, which is quite fragile. * INI package makes the KEY in `[log]` section visible in `[log.sub1]` and `[log.sub1.subA]`, this behavior is quite fragile and would cause more unclear problems, and there is no strong requirement to support `log.<mode>.<logger>` syntax. ## The new design See `logger.go` for documents. ## Screenshot <details> ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/4462d713-ba39-41f5-bb08-de912e67e1ff) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/b188035e-f691-428b-8b2d-ff7b2199b2f9) ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/132e9745-1c3b-4e00-9e0d-15eaea495dee) </details> ## TODO * [x] add some new tests * [x] fix some tests * [x] test some sub-commands (manually ....) --------- Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com> Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de> Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-22 06:35:11 +08:00
format += " ]>"
return fmt.Sprintf(format, args...)
}
fix: allow Actions tokens to access repos readable by signed in users (#8889) This is an alternate take on https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8808 which allows Actions tokens to access other repos which are readable by by signed in users. In practise this means public repos belonging to public or limited owners. This PR is split into two commits to aid review of the security-sensitive changes I've made: * The first commit is a refactor _which is not intended to change behaviour_. It extracts the permission logic for Actions tokens from the githttp handler and moves it to `repo_permission.go` alongside the permission logic for regular users. The new function, `GetActionRepoPermission` returns a `Permission` object just like `GetUserRepoPermission`. Only code unit access is currently allowed in the interest of keeping this commit from changing any access logic. * The second commit is the broadening of access: this commit changes the logic in `GetActionRepoPermission` to give actions tokens access to repos readable by signed in users. cc @earl-warren ref https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/5877 ## Checklist The [contributor guide](https://forgejo.org/docs/next/contributor/) contains information that will be helpful to first time contributors. There also are a few [conditions for merging Pull Requests in Forgejo repositories](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/governance/src/branch/main/PullRequestsAgreement.md). You are also welcome to join the [Forgejo development chatroom](https://matrix.to/#/#forgejo-development:matrix.org). ### Tests - I added test coverage for Go changes... - [x] in their respective `*_test.go` for unit tests. - [x] in the `tests/integration` directory if it involves interactions with a live Forgejo server. - I added test coverage for JavaScript changes... - [ ] in `web_src/js/*.test.js` if it can be unit tested. - [ ] in `tests/e2e/*.test.e2e.js` if it requires interactions with a live Forgejo server (see also the [developer guide for JavaScript testing](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/src/branch/forgejo/tests/e2e/README.md#end-to-end-tests)). ### Documentation - [ ] I created a pull request [to the documentation](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs) to explain to Forgejo users how to use this change. - [x] I did not document these changes and I do not expect someone else to do it. ### Release notes - [ ] I do not want this change to show in the release notes. - [x] I want the title to show in the release notes with a link to this pull request. - [ ] I want the content of the `release-notes/<pull request number>.md` to be be used for the release notes instead of the title. <!--start release-notes-assistant--> ## Release notes <!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo--> - Bug fixes - [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8889): <!--number 8889 --><!--line 0 --><!--description YWxsb3cgQWN0aW9ucyB0b2tlbnMgdG8gYWNjZXNzIHJlcG9zIHJlYWRhYmxlIGJ5IHNpZ25lZCBpbiB1c2Vycw==-->allow Actions tokens to access repos readable by signed in users<!--description--> <!--end release-notes-assistant--> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8889 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Hailey Somerville <hailey@hails.org> Co-committed-by: Hailey Somerville <hailey@hails.org>
2025-08-18 14:40:07 +02:00
func GetActionRepoPermission(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, task *actions_model.ActionTask) (Permission, error) {
// straight forward case: an actions task is attempting to access its own repo
if task.RepoID == repo.ID {
var mode perm_model.AccessMode
// determine default access mode for repo:
if task.IsForkPullRequest {
mode = perm_model.AccessModeRead
} else {
mode = perm_model.AccessModeWrite
}
if err := repo.LoadUnits(ctx); err != nil {
return Permission{}, err
}
perm := Permission{
AccessMode: mode,
Units: repo.Units,
}
return perm, nil
}
return GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, repo, user_model.NewActionsUser())
}
// GetUserRepoPermission returns the user permissions to the repository
func GetUserRepoPermission(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, user *user_model.User) (Permission, error) {
var perm Permission
if log.IsTrace() {
defer func() {
if user == nil {
log.Trace("Permission Loaded for anonymous user in %-v:\nPermissions: %-+v",
repo,
perm)
return
}
log.Trace("Permission Loaded for %-v in %-v:\nPermissions: %-+v",
user,
repo,
perm)
}()
}
// anonymous user visit private repo.
// TODO: anonymous user visit public unit of private repo???
if user == nil && repo.IsPrivate {
perm.AccessMode = perm_model.AccessModeNone
return perm, nil
}
var isCollaborator bool
var err error
if user != nil {
isCollaborator, err = repo_model.IsCollaborator(ctx, repo.ID, user.ID)
if err != nil {
return perm, err
}
}
if err := repo.LoadOwner(ctx); err != nil {
return perm, err
}
// Prevent strangers from checking out public repo of private organization/users
// Allow user if they are collaborator of a repo within a private user or a private organization but not a member of the organization itself
if !organization.HasOrgOrUserVisible(ctx, repo.Owner, user) && !isCollaborator {
perm.AccessMode = perm_model.AccessModeNone
return perm, nil
}
if err := repo.LoadUnits(ctx); err != nil {
return perm, err
}
perm.Units = repo.Units
// anonymous visit public repo
if user == nil {
perm.AccessMode = perm_model.AccessModeRead
return perm, nil
}
// Admin or the owner has super access to the repository
if user.IsAdmin || user.ID == repo.OwnerID {
perm.AccessMode = perm_model.AccessModeOwner
return perm, nil
}
// plain user
perm.AccessMode, err = accessLevel(ctx, user, repo)
if err != nil {
return perm, err
}
if err := repo.LoadOwner(ctx); err != nil {
return perm, err
}
if !repo.Owner.IsOrganization() {
// for a public repo, different repo units may have different default
// permissions for non-restricted users.
if !repo.IsPrivate && !user.IsRestricted && len(repo.Units) > 0 {
perm.UnitsMode = make(map[unit.Type]perm_model.AccessMode)
for _, u := range repo.Units {
if _, ok := perm.UnitsMode[u.Type]; !ok {
perm.UnitsMode[u.Type] = u.DefaultPermissions.ToAccessMode(perm.AccessMode)
}
}
}
return perm, nil
}
perm.UnitsMode = make(map[unit.Type]perm_model.AccessMode)
// Collaborators on organization
if isCollaborator {
for _, u := range repo.Units {
perm.UnitsMode[u.Type] = perm.AccessMode
}
}
// get units mode from teams
teams, err := organization.GetUserRepoTeams(ctx, repo.OwnerID, user.ID, repo.ID)
if err != nil {
return perm, err
}
// if user in an owner team
for _, team := range teams {
Team permission allow different unit has different permission (#17811) * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * fix * gofumpt * Integration test for migration (#18124) integrations: basic test for Gitea {dump,restore}-repo This is a first step for integration testing of DumpRepository and RestoreRepository. It: runs a Gitea server, dumps a repo via DumpRepository to the filesystem, restores the repo via RestoreRepository from the filesystem, dumps the restored repository to the filesystem, compares the first and second dump and expects them to be identical The verification is trivial and the goal is to add more tests for each topic of the dump. Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org> * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * Fix bug Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Aravinth Manivannan <realaravinth@batsense.net>
2022-01-05 11:37:00 +08:00
if team.AccessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeAdmin {
perm.AccessMode = perm_model.AccessModeOwner
perm.UnitsMode = nil
return perm, nil
}
}
for _, u := range repo.Units {
var found bool
for _, team := range teams {
teamMode := team.UnitAccessMode(ctx, u.Type)
Team permission allow different unit has different permission (#17811) * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * fix * gofumpt * Integration test for migration (#18124) integrations: basic test for Gitea {dump,restore}-repo This is a first step for integration testing of DumpRepository and RestoreRepository. It: runs a Gitea server, dumps a repo via DumpRepository to the filesystem, restores the repo via RestoreRepository from the filesystem, dumps the restored repository to the filesystem, compares the first and second dump and expects them to be identical The verification is trivial and the goal is to add more tests for each topic of the dump. Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org> * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * Fix bug Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Aravinth Manivannan <realaravinth@batsense.net>
2022-01-05 11:37:00 +08:00
if teamMode > perm_model.AccessModeNone {
m := perm.UnitsMode[u.Type]
Team permission allow different unit has different permission (#17811) * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * fix * gofumpt * Integration test for migration (#18124) integrations: basic test for Gitea {dump,restore}-repo This is a first step for integration testing of DumpRepository and RestoreRepository. It: runs a Gitea server, dumps a repo via DumpRepository to the filesystem, restores the repo via RestoreRepository from the filesystem, dumps the restored repository to the filesystem, compares the first and second dump and expects them to be identical The verification is trivial and the goal is to add more tests for each topic of the dump. Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org> * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * Fix bug Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Aravinth Manivannan <realaravinth@batsense.net>
2022-01-05 11:37:00 +08:00
if m < teamMode {
perm.UnitsMode[u.Type] = teamMode
}
found = true
}
}
// for a public repo on an organization, a non-restricted user should
// have the same permission on non-team defined units as the default
// permissions for the repo unit.
Restricted users (#6274) * Restricted users (#4334): initial implementation * Add User.IsRestricted & UI to edit it * Pass user object instead of user id to places where IsRestricted flag matters * Restricted users: maintain access rows for all referenced repos (incl public) * Take logged in user & IsRestricted flag into account in org/repo listings, searches and accesses * Add basic repo access tests for restricted users Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Mention restricted users in the faq Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Revert unnecessary change `.isUserPartOfOrg` -> `.IsUserPartOfOrg` Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Remove unnecessary `org.IsOrganization()` call Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * Revert to an `int64` keyed `accessMap` * Add type `userAccess` * Add convenience func updateUserAccess() * Turn accessMap into a `map[int64]userAccess` Signed-off-by: Manush Dodunekov <manush@stendahls.se> * or even better: `map[int64]*userAccess` * updateUserAccess(): use tighter syntax as suggested by lafriks * even tighter * Avoid extra loop * Don't disclose limited orgs to unauthenticated users * Don't assume block only applies to orgs * Use an array of `VisibleType` for filtering * fix yet another thinko * Ok - no need for u * Revert "Ok - no need for u" This reverts commit 5c3e886aabd5acd997a3b35687d322439732c200. Co-authored-by: Antoine GIRARD <sapk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2020-01-13 19:33:46 +02:00
if !found && !repo.IsPrivate && !user.IsRestricted {
if _, ok := perm.UnitsMode[u.Type]; !ok {
perm.UnitsMode[u.Type] = u.DefaultPermissions.ToAccessMode(perm_model.AccessModeRead)
}
}
}
// remove no permission units
perm.Units = make([]*repo_model.RepoUnit, 0, len(repo.Units))
for t := range perm.UnitsMode {
for _, u := range repo.Units {
if u.Type == t {
perm.Units = append(perm.Units, u)
}
}
}
return perm, err
}
// IsUserRealRepoAdmin check if this user is real repo admin
func IsUserRealRepoAdmin(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, user *user_model.User) (bool, error) {
if repo.OwnerID == user.ID {
return true, nil
}
if err := repo.LoadOwner(ctx); err != nil {
return false, err
}
accessMode, err := accessLevel(ctx, user, repo)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
return accessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeAdmin, nil
}
// IsUserRepoAdmin return true if user has admin right of a repo
func IsUserRepoAdmin(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, user *user_model.User) (bool, error) {
if user == nil || repo == nil {
return false, nil
}
if user.IsAdmin {
return true, nil
}
mode, err := accessLevel(ctx, user, repo)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
if mode >= perm_model.AccessModeAdmin {
return true, nil
}
teams, err := organization.GetUserRepoTeams(ctx, repo.OwnerID, user.ID, repo.ID)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
for _, team := range teams {
Team permission allow different unit has different permission (#17811) * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * fix * gofumpt * Integration test for migration (#18124) integrations: basic test for Gitea {dump,restore}-repo This is a first step for integration testing of DumpRepository and RestoreRepository. It: runs a Gitea server, dumps a repo via DumpRepository to the filesystem, restores the repo via RestoreRepository from the filesystem, dumps the restored repository to the filesystem, compares the first and second dump and expects them to be identical The verification is trivial and the goal is to add more tests for each topic of the dump. Signed-off-by: Loïc Dachary <loic@dachary.org> * Team permission allow different unit has different permission * Finish the interface and the logic * Fix lint * Fix translation * align center for table cell content * Fix fixture * merge * Fix test * Add deprecated * Improve code * Add tooltip * Fix swagger * Fix newline * Fix tests * Fix tests * Fix test * Fix test * Max permission of external wiki and issues should be read * Move team units with limited max level below units table * Update label and column names * Some improvements * Fix lint * Some improvements * Fix template variables * Add permission docs * improve doc * Fix fixture * Fix bug * Fix some bug * Fix bug Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de> Co-authored-by: Aravinth Manivannan <realaravinth@batsense.net>
2022-01-05 11:37:00 +08:00
if team.AccessMode >= perm_model.AccessModeAdmin {
return true, nil
}
}
return false, nil
}
// AccessLevel returns the Access a user has to a repository. Will return NoneAccess if the
// user does not have access.
func AccessLevel(ctx context.Context, user *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository) (perm_model.AccessMode, error) { //nolint
return AccessLevelUnit(ctx, user, repo, unit.TypeCode)
}
// AccessLevelUnit returns the Access a user has to a repository's. Will return NoneAccess if the
// user does not have access.
func AccessLevelUnit(ctx context.Context, user *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, unitType unit.Type) (perm_model.AccessMode, error) { //nolint
perm, err := GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, repo, user)
if err != nil {
return perm_model.AccessModeNone, err
}
return perm.UnitAccessMode(unitType), nil
}
// HasAccessUnit returns true if user has testMode to the unit of the repository
func HasAccessUnit(ctx context.Context, user *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, unitType unit.Type, testMode perm_model.AccessMode) (bool, error) {
mode, err := AccessLevelUnit(ctx, user, repo, unitType)
return testMode <= mode, err
}
// CanBeAssigned return true if user can be assigned to issue or pull requests in repo
// Currently any write access (code, issues or pr's) is assignable, to match assignee list in user interface.
func CanBeAssigned(ctx context.Context, user *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, _ bool) (bool, error) {
if user.IsOrganization() {
return false, fmt.Errorf("Organization can't be added as assignee [user_id: %d, repo_id: %d]", user.ID, repo.ID)
}
perm, err := GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, repo, user)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
return perm.CanAccessAny(perm_model.AccessModeWrite, unit.AllRepoUnitTypes...) ||
perm.CanAccessAny(perm_model.AccessModeRead, unit.TypePullRequests), nil
}
// HasAccess returns true if user has access to repo
func HasAccess(ctx context.Context, userID int64, repo *repo_model.Repository) (bool, error) {
var user *user_model.User
var err error
if userID > 0 {
user, err = user_model.GetUserByID(ctx, userID)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
}
perm, err := GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, repo, user)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
return perm.HasAccess(), nil
}
// getUsersWithAccessMode returns users that have at least given access mode to the repository.
func getUsersWithAccessMode(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, mode perm_model.AccessMode) (_ []*user_model.User, err error) {
if err = repo.LoadOwner(ctx); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
e := db.GetEngine(ctx)
accesses := make([]*Access, 0, 10)
if err = e.Where("repo_id = ? AND mode >= ?", repo.ID, mode).Find(&accesses); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// Leave a seat for owner itself to append later, but if owner is an organization
// and just waste 1 unit is cheaper than re-allocate memory once.
users := make([]*user_model.User, 0, len(accesses)+1)
if len(accesses) > 0 {
userIDs := make([]int64, len(accesses))
for i := 0; i < len(accesses); i++ {
userIDs[i] = accesses[i].UserID
}
if err = e.In("id", userIDs).Find(&users); err != nil {
return nil, err
}
}
if !repo.Owner.IsOrganization() {
users = append(users, repo.Owner)
}
return users, nil
}
// GetRepoReaders returns all users that have explicit read access or higher to the repository.
func GetRepoReaders(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository) (_ []*user_model.User, err error) {
return getUsersWithAccessMode(ctx, repo, perm_model.AccessModeRead)
}
// GetRepoWriters returns all users that have write access to the repository.
func GetRepoWriters(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository) (_ []*user_model.User, err error) {
return getUsersWithAccessMode(ctx, repo, perm_model.AccessModeWrite)
}
// IsRepoReader returns true if user has explicit read access or higher to the repository.
func IsRepoReader(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, userID int64) (bool, error) {
if repo.OwnerID == userID {
return true, nil
}
return db.GetEngine(ctx).Where("repo_id = ? AND user_id = ? AND mode >= ?", repo.ID, userID, perm_model.AccessModeRead).Get(&Access{})
}
// CheckRepoUnitUser check whether user could visit the unit of this repository
func CheckRepoUnitUser(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, user *user_model.User, unitType unit.Type) bool {
if user != nil && user.IsAdmin {
return true
}
perm, err := GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, repo, user)
if err != nil {
log.Error("GetUserRepoPermission: %w", err)
return false
}
return perm.CanRead(unitType)
}