An invalid workflow_{dispatch,call} key with a type that is not a map may attempt to use a nil map. It happens randomly as the order of the key maps is not guaranteed. Without this fix, the tests will fail 100% of the time with:
`go test -count=500 -run=TestParseRawOn/on:___workflow_ -v ./pkg/jobparser/`
Regression from https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/act/pulls/45
Reviewed-on: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/act/pulls/193
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
This is a followup of https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/act/pulls/170 so that it is possible to read a workflow without validation. It is not uncommon for Forgejo to read a workflow just to extract a few information from it, knowing it has been validated before. It would be a performance regression if schema validation happened in these cases.
This is a port of https://github.com/nektos/act/pull/2717/files
It is a breaking change in the context of Forgejo and Forgejo runner because it will need to add the new `validate` argument when reading workflows.
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Reviewed-on: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/act/pulls/180
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Keep the order of `on` when parsing workflow, and fix the occasional unit test failure of `actions` like https://gitea.com/gitea/act/actions/runs/68
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/46
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: sillyguodong <gedong_1994@163.com>
Co-committed-by: sillyguodong <gedong_1994@163.com>
