- Changes `EvaluateConcurrency` to `EvaluateWorkflowConcurrency`, which has no job-related arguments
- Changes gitContext to be sent as an object rather than a map
- Allows `nil` to be returned for `cancelInProgress`, which indicates that the value wasn't specified in the input yaml -- required for distinguishing the `cancel-in-progress: false` case from not being specified at all.
ReadWorkflowRawConcurrency & EvaluateWorkflowConcurrency were never used in forgejo yet, so this shouldn't break the forgejo build.
Prerequisite for https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/9434.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
<!--URL:https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner-->
- features
- [PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/1026): <!--number 1026 --><!--line 0 --><!--description ZmVhdDogc3VwcG9ydCBldmFsdWF0aW5nIHdvcmtmbG93LWxldmVsIGNvbmN1cnJlbmN5IGJsb2NrcyBpbiBqb2JwYXJzZXI=-->feat: support evaluating workflow-level concurrency blocks in jobparser<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/1026
Reviewed-by: earl-warren <earl-warren@noreply.code.forgejo.org>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
Co-committed-by: Mathieu Fenniak <mathieu@fenniak.net>
the license change from MIT to GPLv3+ is a breaking change
Refs forgejo/runner#773
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
<!--URL:https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner-->
- other
- [PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/940): <!--number 940 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Y2hvcmU6IGJ1bXAgdmVyc2lvbiB0byB2MTE=-->chore: bump version to v11<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/940
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
It will be imported by Forgejo.
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
<!--URL:https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner-->
- other
- [PR](https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/777): <!--number 777 --><!--line 0 --><!--description Y2hvcmU6IHRvIGFsbG93IHRoZSBydW5uZXIgdG8gYmUgaW1wb3J0ZWQsIHY5IG5lZWRzIHRvIGJlIGluIHRoZSBnbyBtb2R1bGU=-->chore: to allow the runner to be imported, v9 needs to be in the go module<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/runner/pulls/777
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
An invalid workflow_{dispatch,call} key with a type that is not a map may attempt to use a nil map. It happens randomly as the order of the key maps is not guaranteed. Without this fix, the tests will fail 100% of the time with:
`go test -count=500 -run=TestParseRawOn/on:___workflow_ -v ./pkg/jobparser/`
Regression from https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/act/pulls/45
Reviewed-on: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/act/pulls/193
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
This is a followup of https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/act/pulls/170 so that it is possible to read a workflow without validation. It is not uncommon for Forgejo to read a workflow just to extract a few information from it, knowing it has been validated before. It would be a performance regression if schema validation happened in these cases.
This is a port of https://github.com/nektos/act/pull/2717/files
It is a breaking change in the context of Forgejo and Forgejo runner because it will need to add the new `validate` argument when reading workflows.
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Reviewed-on: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/act/pulls/180
Reviewed-by: Michael Kriese <michael.kriese@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Keep the order of `on` when parsing workflow, and fix the occasional unit test failure of `actions` like https://gitea.com/gitea/act/actions/runs/68
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/act/pulls/46
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: sillyguodong <gedong_1994@163.com>
Co-committed-by: sillyguodong <gedong_1994@163.com>
